RSS Feed
Author
- Stuart Aitken (2)
- Joanna Courtney (0)
- Sally Millar (4)
- Paul Nisbet (29)
- Sandra O'Neill (0)
- Robert Stewart (1)
- Allan Wilson (2)
Tags (Top 20)
Blogs have been "tagged" with keywords:
- Books for All (26)
- accessible formats (20)
- dyslexia (15)
- literacy (14)
- print disability (12)
- visual impairment (11)
- eBooks (7)
- AAC (5)
- accessibility (5)
- alternative formats (5)
- audio books (4)
- text-to-speech (3)
- copyright (3)
- curriculum for excellence (3)
- OCR (3)
- scanning (3)
- communication aid (3)
- assistive technology (2)
- symbols (2)
- iPad (2)
Archive
- July 2010 (3)
- June 2010 (1)
- May 2010 (4)
- April 2010 (1)
- March 2010 (7)
- February 2010 (2)
- January 2010 (6)
- December 2009 (5)
- November 2009 (4)
- October 2009 (2)
- September 2009 (1)
- July 2009 (1)
Teach reading, use alternative formats, or do both?
By Paul Nisbet on Tuesday 26th January, 2010 at 1:38pm
2 Comments
Post a comment
Email to a friend
Permalink
The Books for All programme is about learning resources in accessible, alternative formats for people who cannot access standard printed books.
Sometimes this is due to, for example, severe dyslexia, visual impairment, blindness or physical impairment. In these case it is self-evident that the reader can't read a paper book because they either can't see, can't hold the book and turn pages, or just can't read.
But there are also many children and young people who have problems with reading when the cause is less obvious. Maybe they have a language difficulty, or a visual-perceptual problem, or maybe English is not their native tongue.
Or maybe they have never been read to as a child, never been comfortable with print, and have not had enough practice to become a fluent reader. (I read somewhere that you need to practice reading for 5,000 hours to become fluent.)
In these cases, should we try and teach the pupil to read, or should we use, say, audio books or digital books that can be read out by the computer? If we persevere with teaching literacy, will the pupil get frustrated and fall behind in class because they cannot read independently? By introducing books in accessible formats maybe we can prevent this frustration, help the reader be more independent, and at least give experience of language and literature. Maybe if we can encourage pupils to read books in accessible
formats it will help motivate and develop general literacy and actually
help develop reading skills? Maybe the opposite is true: if we give books in accessible formats, will they ever learn to read standard print?
Or should we try to both teach reading and also provide accessible formats so we have the best of both worlds - access to the curriculum and also development of reading skills?
This is a long introduction to a short blog to say that Pearson Education have published some interesting case studies and research reports about their Rapid Reading intervention programme which they say is "an award-winning, Wave 3 reading intervention programme that's been proven to deliver more than twice the normal rate of progress." Of course, there are many programmes and methods which make similar claims (see Dr. Chris Singleton's comprehensive review of teaching methods Interventions for Dyslexia) but the Rapid Reading videos and reports are interesting and well worth a look.
(And if anyone has answers to the questions posed above we'd be really keen to hear them....)
Tags:
Share or bookmark this post:
Comments
Hi Paul
Very interesting post. This whole "making reading accessible" debate fascinates me. I was in touch with you last year regarding WORDTALK for a verbally dyspraxic pupil. This pupil, essentially a non reader, has recently passed level D reading. A small part in this success, I hope, is the fact that he is in a big reading group which listens to texts that I prepare for them on MP3. This allows him to engage with the story and take part fully in group discussions. He may never read fluently but he can now contribute meaningfully which has done wonders for his self esteem.
Personally I say we go with the technology, immerse the kids in words and hope for the best....can't do any harm surely?
Very interesting post. This whole "making reading accessible" debate fascinates me. I was in touch with you last year regarding WORDTALK for a verbally dyspraxic pupil. This pupil, essentially a non reader, has recently passed level D reading. A small part in this success, I hope, is the fact that he is in a big reading group which listens to texts that I prepare for them on MP3. This allows him to engage with the story and take part fully in group discussions. He may never read fluently but he can now contribute meaningfully which has done wonders for his self esteem.
Personally I say we go with the technology, immerse the kids in words and hope for the best....can't do any harm surely?

#2. Sarah MacAlpine - Wednesday 17th February, 2010 at 11:16pm
As an after thought, because I do my best thinking after I click the submit button, I also saw great success with children who had little success using traditional methods despite being read to extensively by their parents. Perhaps it is the independence and sense of control that are the key factors? All I know for certain is that children who previously lacked motivation for reading became actively engaged with their learning and became "overnight successes" after years of failure.
That may be integral to the success stories being reported by the creators of Rapid Reading. I am keen to try their resources in my current school.
In my opinion whatever works is what is best and our role is to discover what that is and go with it.
That may be integral to the success stories being reported by the creators of Rapid Reading. I am keen to try their resources in my current school.
In my opinion whatever works is what is best and our role is to discover what that is and go with it.
Leave a Comment for Teach reading, use alternative formats, or do both?
indicates required fields


#1. Kevin Farmer - Friday 12th February, 2010 at 10:58pm